Chief Legal Architect and a co-founder of Caffrey.AI
Steven Lofchie is the Chief Legal Architect and a co-founder of Caffrey.AI, an AI platform built for law firms, banks, and the financial regulatory industry. He is also a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright, where he advises financial institutions on securities laws, the Commodity Exchange Act, and broker-dealer regulation. Ranked by Chambers USA every year since 2007, he is the author of “Lofchie’s Guide to Broker-Dealer Regulation,” long considered the leading treatise on the subject.
Recent Articles & Comments
One step that the SEC might take to address the lack of liquidity in small businesses is to revisit rules regulating the production and distribution of investment research. Following the discovery of material improprieties by firms in the production of investment research on internet companies, the SEC adopted rules that both significantly raised the compliance costs of producing research and diminished the possible business benefits of doing so. These rules should now be…
The name of the hearing, "Hold Executives Accountable," reveals, to unfortunate effect, what you need to know about this hearing and the majority of the proposals. The proposals seem to take a general view that executives are often bad actors, overly compensated, and are not sufficiently liable for corporate wrongdoing under existing law. This general view, and the language in certain of the proposals, could result in a practical effect that the bills give license to regulators…
On the one hand, it is certainly a positive that the SEC is announcing an intellectual framework for determining whether a "digital asset" (perhaps better known as an "Initial Coin Offering" or "ICO") is within the definition of the term "security." On the other hand, the framework definitely casts a very broad net, which no doubt was intended.
As to the question of whether digital assets involve a "common enterprise," the SEC simply says that "[b]ased on our experiences to…
The incoming no-action letter (which doubtless was negotiated with the SEC and is ) seems to concede - without argument - that the tokens "may" constitute a "common enterprise," though it is not obvious that it does.
The issuer can afford to concede on this point because its "real" argument is that there is no expectation of profit from a customer's purchase of the assets. The customer is simply buying for one dollar a digital asset that he expects to use to purchase services…