Skip to main content

Steven Lofchie is the Chief Legal Architect and a co-founder of Caffrey.AI, an AI platform built for law firms, banks, and the financial regulatory industry. He is also a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright, where he advises financial institutions on securities laws, the Commodity Exchange Act, and broker-dealer regulation. Ranked by Chambers USA every year since 2007, he is the author of “Lofchie’s Guide to Broker-Dealer Regulation,” long considered the leading treatise on the subject.

Recent Articles & Comments

The legislative language authorizing the CFPB () provides as follows: 

There is established in the Federal Reserve System, an independent bureau to be known as the 'Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection', which shall regulate the offering and provision of consumer financial products or services under the Federal consumer financial laws.

It is not the job of the CFPB to regulate bank mergers. There is no doubt that many of the senior regulators…

Defenders of recent SEC actions argue that their rulemaking efforts are just "simple, common sense." When an agency is making rules that impact a major part of the economy, that provides services directly or indirectly to everyone, and that sells numerous different products of all types, there is actually not very much that is simple common sense. It's actually quite complicated, and the details matter. The SEC is not capable of giving birth to rules as if it were Zeus giving birth to Athena…

Mr. Grewal gets the problem exactly right, albeit perhaps not the way in which he intends. To quote Mr. Grewal, crypto market participants "want a different set of rules than those that apply to everyone else." That is correct. Crypto market participants want a set of rules that are designed for that asset type. That is not a desire that is unique to crypto. The regulations that apply to corporates are not the same as those that apply to investment funds, which are not the same as those that…

Governor Bowman has been a consistent critic of what she believes are the failures of banking regulators to with a proper analysis of costs and of their failure to focus on those issues that should be matters of their primary focus (i.e. prudential bank regulation and supervision, rather than e.g. .)