Chief Legal Architect and a co-founder of Caffrey.AI
Steven Lofchie is the Chief Legal Architect and a co-founder of Caffrey.AI, an AI platform built for law firms, banks, and the financial regulatory industry. He is also a partner at Norton Rose Fulbright, where he advises financial institutions on securities laws, the Commodity Exchange Act, and broker-dealer regulation. Ranked by Chambers USA every year since 2007, he is the author of “Lofchie’s Guide to Broker-Dealer Regulation,” long considered the leading treatise on the subject.
Recent Articles & Comments
Even before this Order was settled, it was a topic of common discussion among crypto market participants that the CFTC staff investigating the U.S. activities of Binance, and of Binance's customers, seemed to be searching for novel and expanded theories on which to base U.S. jurisdiction, and thus on which to assert CFTC jurisdictional authority. Commissioner Pham's concurrence is devastating as to those theories.
It is not a good look for an agency when it touts the…
This is the second set of detailed statistical information as to the funds industry that the SEC released. (See, .) In issuing this data and the prior data, the SEC touts the value of the information to the public. However, in neither case has the SEC explained why the information is valuable to the public or how the public might use the data. In fact, the value of the information to a public investor is not obvious, and it is not at all clear what use an investor could or would make of…
There is no little irony to the CRS quoting President Biden's statement that the United States should remain a leader in the international finance system, when one considers that the SEC and other agencies have put up roadblocks on the development of a regulatory framework for digital assets for the entirety of the President's administration.
The SEC's war on digital assets may be best illustrated by its accounting bulletin requiring banks that provide custodial services with respect…
It is difficult to make the argument that the types of contracts that the CFTC seeks to ban are within the scope of its statutory authority.
It is not sufficient for the CFTC to determine that the relevant contract is contrary to the public interest; the contract must be related to something quite bad or "gaming." It is likewise not correct that elections are not events of economic significance. It may very well be the case that Congress would have prohibited election contracts…